🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions about that comments made by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's victory over the American player during the New York major last eight. Consider – Fritz is American, Fowler is from the US – and sports often encourage nationalism. Some letdown would have been appropriate. Rather, Fowler invoked the continued absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all enjoy a narrative, me too. But really. Even if the American defeated the legend for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the following match, who he has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven major titles (plus the Spaniard went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He said in press after the loss that he actually preferred his draw, because it presented the chance to beat the top three competitors in the sport in succession. He is more than within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match what other person sensibly had the lack of American champions in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

Fritz, 28, is placed number four in the world entering the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his last six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But it’s clear that at present, that is as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class serve and concussive strength on each forehand and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to dispose of the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is often helpless. The last several seasons has seen the interesting emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising speed and fluidity of smaller men. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite harsh limitation on his upside.

Fritz has made a several significant, unexpected advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. 24 months after, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded up to No 4 – and held the spot. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, Sinner, and including a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing drought of US male players winning grand slams when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best run to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

The American's play in that very last eight match should have been enough of an sign. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz creating plenty of opportunities to break. But Djokovic rescued break point after break point, prolonging the streak to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a terrible service game to drop serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to use far too much energy to prevail. Facing set points in the last game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He extended the contest twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, only a consequence of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly ironclad evidence that the American is not good enough to beat any version of the Serbian, that lost to the Spaniard in the following match and did not particularly appeared like he believed he could win. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired enough knowledge and tactical know-how to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he could.

The American is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in media sessions, more so than almost anyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only say his emotions or the tactic he believed decided a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America not spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably think about it forever if I don’t do it,” the American told an interviewer in the summer of winning a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely unlikely for all other players. {