🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.